
More about the San people...

From The Collaborative International Dictionary of English v.0.48 [gcide]:
Hunt \Hunt\ (h[u^]nt), v. t. [imp. & p. p. {Hunted}; p. pr. &
vb. n. {Hunting}.] [AS. huntian to hunt; cf. hentan to
follow, pursue, Goth. hin?an (in comp.) to seize. [root]36.
Cf. {Hent}.]
1. To search for or follow after, as game or wild animals; to
chase; to pursue for the purpose of catching or killing;
to follow with dogs or guns for sport or exercise; as, to
hunt a deer.
[1913 Webster]
Like a dog, he hunts in dreams. --Tennyson.
[1913 Webster]
2. To search diligently after; to seek; to pursue; to follow;
-- often with out or up; as, to hunt up the facts; to hunt
out evidence.
[1913 Webster]
Evil shall hunt the violent man to overthrow him.
--Ps. cxl. 11.
[1913 Webster]

 Also, there were some aesthetics involved in my decision to go with my older bow. This is odd but true, the newest compound bows barely resemble what I think of as a "bow". In your mind take a moment and think of a bow as just the object. What is it? What does it consist of? In the mind of most people it's an image of a taut arch, a tense open parenthetical, "(", with arms that perhaps curve slightly forward at the tips. A hand grip in the middle, an arrow rests perhaps. The arrows, at least in my mind, are white, with feather fletching and suction cups for tips. To this day you say "bow and arrow" and I think of that set that I used to terrorize my cousin Paula and break a few windows with.
Also, there were some aesthetics involved in my decision to go with my older bow. This is odd but true, the newest compound bows barely resemble what I think of as a "bow". In your mind take a moment and think of a bow as just the object. What is it? What does it consist of? In the mind of most people it's an image of a taut arch, a tense open parenthetical, "(", with arms that perhaps curve slightly forward at the tips. A hand grip in the middle, an arrow rests perhaps. The arrows, at least in my mind, are white, with feather fletching and suction cups for tips. To this day you say "bow and arrow" and I think of that set that I used to terrorize my cousin Paula and break a few windows with.  This, however, is not the contemporary compound bow. When you first look at the thing, your eye goes to the wheels. There are cam systems and cables, wrapping back and forth. At full draw the weight of the pull lets off almost 50%, so pulling a fifty pound bow, suddenly feels like twenty-five pounds, allowing the hunter to hold the ready position for an extended period.   This is a considerable advantage especially when taking aim on a cautious members of the cervids family. Next, the arms of the bow themselves of are almost parallel to the ground when in use, leaving it looking more like an "E" than a parenthesis. This gives it a compact design that makes moving through the brush or shooting in constrained positions easier. Finally there are the "add ons": Peep sights, string silencers, "whisker biscuit" arrow rest, the ballast stabilizer, and quick quiver. It's construction to the thousandth of an inch, it's material, space age polymers and carbon compounds... If it wasn't for the limited range, it would be just another name for a gun. So, the bow for me though still holds some romance. It was mankind's first great missile. It was the first expression of our complete technological advantage. Proto-humans showed an understanding of the jawbone of the ass, and the edge of the broken flint, but it took the homo sapien brain to put together the many parts of the bow. Otzi is my favorite early archer. With the bow, the control we could now express tripled that of the spear or sling in both distance and accuracy. 5300 years ago and now one man could suddenly fell much larger beasts at much greater range of intersection. This was a massive advance for all mankind. And here, at Targeteers Archery of  Saddel Brook, NJ,  I was looking over it's latest morphology.
This, however, is not the contemporary compound bow. When you first look at the thing, your eye goes to the wheels. There are cam systems and cables, wrapping back and forth. At full draw the weight of the pull lets off almost 50%, so pulling a fifty pound bow, suddenly feels like twenty-five pounds, allowing the hunter to hold the ready position for an extended period.   This is a considerable advantage especially when taking aim on a cautious members of the cervids family. Next, the arms of the bow themselves of are almost parallel to the ground when in use, leaving it looking more like an "E" than a parenthesis. This gives it a compact design that makes moving through the brush or shooting in constrained positions easier. Finally there are the "add ons": Peep sights, string silencers, "whisker biscuit" arrow rest, the ballast stabilizer, and quick quiver. It's construction to the thousandth of an inch, it's material, space age polymers and carbon compounds... If it wasn't for the limited range, it would be just another name for a gun. So, the bow for me though still holds some romance. It was mankind's first great missile. It was the first expression of our complete technological advantage. Proto-humans showed an understanding of the jawbone of the ass, and the edge of the broken flint, but it took the homo sapien brain to put together the many parts of the bow. Otzi is my favorite early archer. With the bow, the control we could now express tripled that of the spear or sling in both distance and accuracy. 5300 years ago and now one man could suddenly fell much larger beasts at much greater range of intersection. This was a massive advance for all mankind. And here, at Targeteers Archery of  Saddel Brook, NJ,  I was looking over it's latest morphology. 
 There's something that bothers me about taxidermy.  It's an artifice somehow and speaks of something vainglorious. I mean, of course we can kill animals, we're highly developed technological species! Assuming I score a buck, I think I'll hang up the skull to remind me of the act. The death. Other than that, I hope to find a way to use almost all of the deer. Eat it of course, but also, carve the bone and antlers into usable forms. Suggestions welcome on that one.
 There's something that bothers me about taxidermy.  It's an artifice somehow and speaks of something vainglorious. I mean, of course we can kill animals, we're highly developed technological species! Assuming I score a buck, I think I'll hang up the skull to remind me of the act. The death. Other than that, I hope to find a way to use almost all of the deer. Eat it of course, but also, carve the bone and antlers into usable forms. Suggestions welcome on that one.   I took this from the Brooklyn waterfront about October of 2000
I took this from the Brooklyn waterfront about October of 2000 I was there
 I was there 
Later, in my early adolescence, I found myself drawn as many boys are to the martial arts. We were living deep into a wooded West County. I had a 35# recurve bow, one of the arms slightly twisted. I spent a year or two burying bolts in a hay bale. Sometimes hunting around for a squirrel and very occasionally going deer hunting with a cousin. Loud, smelly, and untrained, I of course get nowhere near any real game. 
But this past Christmas I took my two year old daughter, Junia, back to my father's house. 
He again lives in a wooded area and with little else to do, we spent hours walking on a carpet of fallen leaves, under bare limbed oak and elm. The surrounding area is an old farm slowly converting to ex-urbia so there were deer tracks everywhere. At the edge of the woods, feeling that old cold, that very particular early morning wet chill, and in the dark and alluring emptiness. I could feel it. 
I wanted to hunt again.